Skip to main content

Table 1 Inputs for application of the models of indicators of performances of the given trunk line/route 1)

From: Multidimensional examination of the performances of a liner shipping network: trunk line/route operated by conventional (Panamax Max) and mega (ULC - ultra large container) ships

Input variable

Notation/Unit

Value

• Period of time

τ (years)

1

• The TEU flows during given period of time 2)

Qij(τ) + Qji(τ) (TEU/year)

2,433,543

• Container ship payload capacity, length, beam (width) 3)

PLij/ Lij/ Wij (TEU/ship)

4000/294/32

18,000/399/59

• Collection and distribution rate and their use for the parcel of TEUs - the supplier (Hong Kong) and the consumer seaport (Rotterdam)

θi/ri- θj/rj (TEU/day)/(−) - (TEU/day)/(−)

1100/1.0–1100/1.0

• Loading/unloading rate per crane, the number of cranes used, TEU-factor, the rate of crane use at the supplier seaport (Hong Kong) 4)

mi1/2/nci/kci/ρc/i/PLij (moves/h)/(−) (TEU/move)/ (−)/(TEU/ship)

36/3/1.5/0.75/4000 36/6/1.5/0.75/18000

• Loading/unloading rate per crane, the number of cranes used, TEU- factor, the rate of crane use - the customer seaport (Rotterdam) 4)

mj1/2/ncj/kcj/ρc/j/PLij(moves/h)/(−) (TEU/move)/ (−)/(TEU/ship)

42/3/1.5/0.75/4000

42/6/1.5/0.75/18000

• Time between collecting and loading at the supplier seaport (Hong Kong), and between unloading and distributing at the customer port (Rotterdam) - a TEU parcel

Δij- Δji (day(s)) -(day(s))

1.0–1.0

• Operating distance between the supplier and the customer seaport 5)

dij/dji (nm)/(nm)

9748/9748

• Average operating speed of container ships 6)

vij (kts)

20 (Slow steaming)

15 (Super slow steaming)

• Portion of the maintained average ship’s operating speed

sij/sji (−)/(−)

1.0/1.0

• Proportion of realized transport services

βij/βji (−)/(−)

1.0/1.0

• Average delay per realized transport service

Dij/Dji- Ddi/Daj- Ddj/Dai(days)/(h)/(h)

0.0/0.0–0.0/0.0–0.0/0.0

• Container inventory costs - the supplier and the customer seaport 7)

αi, αj ($US/TEU-day)

159; 159

• Container costs of time in transportation 8)

αij ($US/TEU-day)

13.6

• Container handling costs at the supplier seaport (Hong Kong) and the customer seaport (Rotterdam) 9)

ci- cj ($US/TEU) -($US/TEU)

234–200

• Container ship sea/operating costs 10)

cij/vij/PLij ($US/TEU-day)/(kts)/ (TEU/ship)

14.5/20; 10.9/15;4000

12.1/20; 7.0/15;18,000

• Average fuel consumption of container ship at sea 11)

fc/ij/vij/PLij (ton/day)/(kts)/(TEU/ship)

75.5/20; 32.1/15;4000

240.2/20; 106.5/15;18,000

• Average emissions of GHG (Green House Gases) by container ship 12)

eij/vij/PLij(tonCO2e/day)/ (kts)/(TEU/ship)

239.3/20; 101.6/15;4000

761.4/20; 337.6/15;18,000

• Average price of CO2 emissions 13)

\( {C}_{CO_2} \) ($US/ton)

32

• Average loading/unloading time of a ship-the supplier seaport (Hong Kong) 14)

τi1/μi/PLij (days)/(TEU/h)/ (TEU/ship)

0.96/108/4000

2.06/216/18000

• Average loading/unloading time of a ship-the customer seaport (Rotterdam) 15)

τj1/μj/PLij(days)/(TEU/h)/ (TEU/ship)

0.82/126/4000

1.71/252/18000

• Berth’s operational time and utilization 15)

nh/i/j/ndyr/i/j/ρb/i/j (h/day)/(days/yr)/(−)

24/360/0.35

• Berth’s width 16)

Si/j (m)

60

Dwell time, area occupied by container, number of stacks, utilization of available space, operating time of container terminals 17)

\( {\overline{t}}_{d/i/j} \)/ATEU/i/j/ncts/ij/ nct/dyr/i/j/ρct/i/j(days)/(m2/TEU)/(−)/ (−)/(days/yr)

2/11.5/3/365/0.7

• Rate of container ship losses 18)

p (Number/TEU-mile)

4.492·10−12

  1. 1)The liner shipping trunk line/route: Hong Kong (China) - Rotterdam (The Netherlands); 2) Estimated based on Fig. 6 (15% of the total amount of the Far East-North Europe route/market); 3) Indicators of technical/technological performances based on design; 4) (Dynamar 2015; HKMPB 2006; Mongelluzzo 2013; SCG 2013; https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/apm-terminals-rotterdam-the-most-productive-terminal-in-europe/); 5) (https://sea-distances.org/); 6) (AECOM 2012; IFT 2015); 7) (REM Associates 2014; Rodrigue 2013); 8) (VTI 2013); 9) (EC 2009); 10) Based on the load factor of: 0.73 (4000 TEU/ ship) and 0.65 (18,000 TEU/ship) (Christa et al. 2008; Drewry 2017; EC 2009; UNCTAD 2017; https://shipandbunker.com/prices/); 11) (AECOM 2012; Churchill and Johnson 2012; Notteboom and Carriou 2009); 12) Based on the emission rate of 3.17 ton CO2e/ton of fuel (IMO 2017); 13) (Synapse 2015; WRI 2016); 14) Based on the specified load factors; 15) (Ligteringen and Velsink 2014); 16) Handling the large ship-to-shore gantry cranes (Ligteringen and Velsink 2014); 17) (Dynamar 2015; Ligteringen and Velsink 2014); 18) Period: 2007–2017 (Allianz 2017; UNCTAD 2017)
  2. (Note: Estimation of the monetary inputs have included the appropriate adjustments respecting inflation and exchange rates of the $US and other currencies over time)