Table 6 Major areas Brexit has been of Negative effect in the respondents'' organisation
| Â | Frequency | Valid percent | Cumulative percent |
|---|---|---|---|
Valid | 1 | 7.1 | 7.1 |
Additional costs to create customs paperwork, delays at customers and/or ports to enable generation of paperwork, significant amount of uncertainty and training associated with the additional requirements following Brexit | 1 | 7.1 | 14.3 |
Border delays, Driver shortages, Increased admin time- more paperwork | 1 | 7.1 | 21.4 |
Decreased UK exports, created a divide for UK & EU traders | 1 | 7.1 | 28.6 |
Increase in taxation, Bilateral relations with other neighbouring countries | 1 | 7.1 | 35.7 |
Indirect impact from Unavailability of haulage drivers | 1 | 7.1 | 42.9 |
Mobilities, training | 1 | 7.1 | 50.0 |
Port increased operative measures | 1 | 7.1 | 57.1 |
Port operative process, Trailers been stuck, UK borders restriction | 1 | 7.1 | 64.3 |
Reduce freight volume | 1 | 7.1 | 71.4 |
Rising costs. Business relationships. Product or service sourcing and hiring staff | 1 | 7.1 | 78.6 |
Shortage of drivers, restrictions from border checks | 1 | 7.1 | 85.7 |
Shortage of drivers, shortage of workers, restrictions due to crossing border policies | 1 | 7.1 | 92.9 |
Their understanding and implications of Brexit border controls have generated a considerable workload. Also, the very considerable developments in supply chains following the break. Work in advising manufacturers of alternative sources of materials and components | 1 | 7.1 | 100.0 |
Total | 14 | 100.0 | Â |