Table 9 Strategies implemented by respondent's organisation for continuous freight movement despite the Brexit and Covid 19 pandemic
| Â | Frequency | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Â | 3 | 21.4 | 21.4 |
Additional capacity-pure RoRo, following hygiene measures, unaccompanied freight mode | 1 | 7.1 | 28.6 |
Alternative transport movement | 1 | 7.1 | 35.7 |
Continuous effective operation | 1 | 7.1 | 42.9 |
Created a customs brokerage to facilitate freight customs documents | 1 | 7.1 | 50.0 |
Increase in haulage cost, Alternative routes, Move of operations to the EU | 1 | 7.1 | 57.1 |
Letter call for action to government | 1 | 7.1 | 64.3 |
More unaccompanied RoRo freight movement, increased routes, terminal expansion | 1 | 7.1 | 71.4 |
Preparation in advance, capacity increase, cost-effective alternative to the traditional route | 1 | 7.1 | 78.6 |
Significant research into the requirements (the information available from Governments is not clear), training of office-based and driving staff, and establishing accounts with all available ferry operators as a backup in the event of a delay | 1 | 7.1 | 85.7 |
Using flexible capacity, Flexible crew, staff put on furlough instead of redundancy | 1 | 7.1 | 92.9 |
Various strategies includes the following: | 1 | 7.1 | 100.0 |
Valid Total | 14 | 100.0 | Â |