Table 1 Levels of urban freight transport (UFT) policy maturity

Pure Market

Low

Minimal

Minimal involvement, lack of staff with related responsibilities and expertise, no data collection, policy mainly focused on passenger, freight policy only relates to restrictions. Minimal mention of UFT in strategic documents. Generally, left to the market

Policy Appeasing

Low/Medium

Irregular

Unambitious aspirations for freight in strategic policy documents, lack of relevant expertise or experience in the subject area, no data collection, limited implementation of UFT related projects beyond the restrictive level, limited engagement with key stakeholders. Policy actions primarily driven by external pressures

Policy Focus

Medium

On Going

Clearly determined goals for UFT in strategic policy documents, although generally lacking at the tactical level. Ad-hoc data collection, no formal body to engage with key stakeholders. Lack of specific UFT related freight projects, those that exist are more focused on better use of public space

Aspirant

Medium/High

Proactive/Strategic/Core

Continuous high level of tactical engagement, if lacking in a degree of co-ordination, improvements in the planning and implementation of specific UFT measures, involvement in UFT focused initiatives on a regular basis. Has a formal stakeholder forum

Proactive

High

Taking Initiative/Strategic/Core

UFT a key strategic objective, regular data collection, high level of expertise in UFT in the public administration, reflected by broad experience in the implementation of regular and co-ordinated UFT projects, decisions made in collaboration with key UFT stakeholders through a formal body e.g. a freight quality partnership (FQP)