Table 3 Results of regression analyses (Step 2 of efficiency estimation algorithm)
From: Market access and seaport efficiency: the case of container handling in Norway
Harris measures | LSCI | Direct centrality (DC) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLS | RE | OLS | RE | IV | IV-RE | IV | IV-RE | IV | IV-RE | IV | IV-RE | |
Harris fl | − 0.030*** | 0.036** | − 0.050*** | − 0.025 | ||||||||
(0.010) | (0.015) | (0.011) | (0.030) | |||||||||
Harris hl | 0.002*** | 0.003** | 0.002*** | 0.002** | ||||||||
(0.000) | (0.001) | (0.000) | (0.001) | |||||||||
LSCI | 0.015*** | 0.027** | 0.014*** | 0.014 | ||||||||
(0.005) | (0.013) | (0.005) | (0.017) | |||||||||
DC, country | 0.105*** | 0.231 | 0.085*** | 0.119 | ||||||||
(0.022) | (0.254) | (0.025) | (0.312) | |||||||||
DC, port | 0.037*** | − 0.066 | 0.062*** | 0.014 | ||||||||
(0.011) | (0.045) | (0.015) | (0.127) | |||||||||
Trend | 0.012*** | 0.009** | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.022*** | 0.013 | ||||||
(0.003) | (0.004) | (0.004) | (0.004) | (0.006) | (0.020) | |||||||
q2 | − 0.031 | − 0.032 | − 0.068 | − 0.068 | 0.009 | 0.004 | ||||||
(0.058) | (0.046) | (0.086) | (0.067) | (0.108) | (0.083) | |||||||
q3 | 0.043 | 0.039 | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.070 | 0.062 | ||||||
(0.058) | (0.047) | (0.086) | (0.056) | (0.108) | (0.068) | |||||||
q4 | − 0.002 | − 0.006 | − 0.072 | − 0.074 | 0.021 | 0.017 | ||||||
(0.059) | (0.047) | (0.089) | (0.091) | (0.109) | (0.070) | |||||||
α | − 8.544*** | − 9.620*** | − 8.395*** | − 8.748*** | − 9.933*** | − 10.687*** | − 9.855*** | − 9.877*** | − 9.945*** | − 9.163*** | − 10.546*** | − 9.923*** |
(0.166) | (0.272) | (0.166) | (0.460) | (0.316) | (0.879) | (0.298) | (1.048) | (0.179) | (0.759) | (0.300) | (1.423) | |
N | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 | 224 |