Skip to main content

Table 3 Importance of weights, normalization and ranking of criteria

From: A decision-making framework for the funding of shipping decarbonization initiatives in non-EU countries: insights from Türkiye

 

Criteria

Weights

Rank

C9

Applying better fund models (i.e., International Maritime Research Fund) incentivizes investments in alternative fuels and technologies

0.212

1

C6

Implementing a Cap-and-Trade system with strict pollution limits and tradable allowances

0.147

2

C5

Promoting strict local regulations to limit airborne emissions at ports and inland waterways, and make cold-ironing at ports compulsory whenever available

0.139

3

C8

Hedging carbon futures contracts to manage the carbon pricing risk

0.129

4

C2

Financing maritime decarbonization projects

0.115

5

C4

Developing sustainability certifications and suitable schemes

0.093

6

C7

Devising attractive incentives to attract operators to nearby non-EU ports

0.075

7

C3

Differentiating port charges

0.052

8

C1

Using incentives to cover onshore power service fees

0.038

9